From a.a.b.klein@uva.nl Mon Oct 8 05:30:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: verde@star.izt.uam.mx Delivered-To: verde@star.izt.uam.mx Received: from struik.uva.nl (struik.uva.nl [146.50.98.69]) by star.izt.uam.mx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891263BC8C for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 05:30:58 -0500 (CDT) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C80995.D195C29C" Subject: : Final list Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 12:27:25 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200710051915.33868.verde@star.izt.uam.mx> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: : Final list Thread-Index: AcgHsi+LCtN8L+7WR3+2wjGXbfOUxAB4OxDw From: "Klein, A.A.B." To: "Luis Verde" Cc: "Beatrice Meini" , "Daniel Hershkowitz" , "Daniel Szyld" , "Jeffrey Stuart" , "Luz de Alba" , "Rafael Bru" , "Vadim Olshevsky" , "Dale Olesky" Status: R This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C80995.D195C29C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =20 Dear colleagues, =20 First I want to thank Luis for putting this alltogether and other = colleagues as well ! I am happy to see that 4 of the suggested names are = on the list. Apparently, the common denominator is not equal to zero. =20 I do agree with Raphael that a majority of the ILAS conference = attendands are not particularly interested in NLA. =20 I do fully agree with the compromise list of Beatrice ! =20 However, for the case (i) Gemignani or Fasino I would vote for = Gemignani. (ii) Spitkovski or Ball I would vote for = Spitkovski (iii) Beatrice mentions Van Dooren or de Wilde, it = is difficult for me to choose because I am in favour of both ! Let the majority decide. =20 =20 Best wishes =20 Andre =20 =20 =20 =20 -----Original Message----- From: Luis Verde [mailto:verde@star.izt.uam.mx]=20 Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 2:16 AM To: Klein, A.A.B.; Beatrice Meini; Daniel Hershkowitz; Daniel Szyld; = Jeffrey Stuart; Luz de Alba; Rafael Bru; Vadim Olshevsky; Dale Olesky Subject: Final list =20 Dear Friends: =20 Taking into consideration your comments from this last week I propose = the=20 following list: =20 1. Higham (Trefethen) 2. Hogben (Naomi Shaked-Monderer) 3. Pe=F1a=20 4. Fallat 5. Dopico=20 6. Gemignani (Fasino) 7. Kressner (Oseledets) 8. Bapat or Fassbender 9. Boettcher 10. Van Dooren (Pauca) 11. Spitkovski (Ball) =20 I think that adding the 11-th speaker will help in the decision process. = We=20 will make some adjustments in the parallel sessions to accomodate for = the=20 extra plenary talk.=20 =20 Please send your opinion about this new list. Note that in 8. we have to = choose who goes first, Bapat or Fassbender. Other names that were mentioned in your recent comments are Liesen and=20 Frommer. I think we really have to work faster now.=20 =20 Best regards =20 Luis ------_=_NextPart_001_01C80995.D195C29C Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 

Dear colleagues,

 

First I want to thank Luis for putting this alltogether and other colleagues as well ! I am happy to see that 4 of = the suggested names are on the list.

Apparently, the common denominator is not = equal to zero.

 

I do agree with Raphael that a majority of = the ILAS conference attendands are not particularly interested in = NLA.

 

I do fully agree with the compromise list of = Beatrice !

 

However, for the case (i) Gemignani or Fasino = I would vote for Gemignani.

=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0 (ii) Spitkovski or Ball I would vote for =A0Spitkovski

=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0 (iii) Beatrice mentions Van Dooren or de Wilde, it is difficult for me to choose because I am in = favour of both !

=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Let the majority = decide.

 

 

Best wishes

 

Andre

 

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Luis Verde [mailto:verde@star.izt.uam.mx]
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 2:16 AM
To: Klein, A.A.B.; Beatrice = Meini; Daniel Hershkowitz; Daniel Szyld; Jeffrey Stuart; Luz de Alba; Rafael = Bru; Vadim Olshevsky; Dale Olesky
Subject: Final list

 

Dear Friends:

 

Taking into consideration your comments from = this last week I propose the

following list:

 

1. Higham = (Trefethen)

2. Hogben (Naomi = Shaked-Monderer)

3. Pe=F1a

4. Fallat

5. Dopico

6. Gemignani = (Fasino)

7. Kressner = (Oseledets)

8. Bapat or = Fassbender

9. Boettcher

10. Van Dooren = (Pauca)

11. Spitkovski = (Ball)

 

I think that adding the 11-th speaker will = help in the decision process. We

will make some adjustments in the parallel = sessions to accomodate for the

extra plenary talk. =

 

Please send your opinion about this new list. = Note that in 8. we have to

choose who goes first, Bapat or = Fassbender.

Other names that were mentioned in your = recent comments are Liesen and

Frommer.

I think we really have to work faster now. =

 

Best regards

 

Luis

------_=_NextPart_001_01C80995.D195C29C--